Where to share photos. Where to post your photos? Publishers and advertising agencies

Vkontakte, My World, Odnoklassniki, Facebook, Google+ and many other services can be used to distribute photos, pictures and other graphic content.

Where can I post photos online?

In addition to social networks, there are a lot of services that accept pictures and photos. For example, you can use the Yandex.Fotki service. If your picture (photo) becomes the most popular, it will be presented on the main page of Yandex and millions of users will see it.

You can also use the following resources:

Ipernity.com is one of the most popular sites in the world where Internet users post their photos. By using this resource, you can not only show photos to Internet users, but also free up space on your hard drive.
Fishup.ru is a popular photo community in RuNet where users share their own pictures. You can start making money on this site if you open your photography courses.
Lifeisphoto.ru is a less popular, but high-quality and interesting resource where you can also post all your photos and pictures.
Instagram.com- through this service, users share almost any photos, audio and video recordings. Today, this is one of the most popular sites, posting photos on it, you will show them to an audience of millions.
Gallery.ru is another photo community in Russia, which was created back in 2006. There are quite a lot of users, so your photos will be seen by a huge number of users.

If you are thinking about showing your photos, most likely you have a lot of high-quality and interesting pictures. Have you thought about selling them? This can be done thanks to photobanks.

Here is a list of the most popular projects where you can sell your photos:

Shutterstock.com
istockphoto.com
Fotolia.com
dreamtime.com

Before you publish your photos, think about where to upload them and set a specific goal. If you do not want to earn money, then post photos on social media. networks and other projects, helping them to develop.

I advise you to visit the following pages.

Price: 15 GB of storage is free, after exceeding the volume, photos and videos will be compressed. You can check the tariff plans on page Google drive.
Applications:
Russian language support: there is.

Price: 5 GB of storage for free. 50 GB - 59 rubles per month, 200 GB - 149 rubles per month, 2 TB - 599 rubles per month. Details about tariff plans can be found.
Applications: macOS, iOS.
Russian language support: there is.

If you use Apple devices - your choice. Otherwise, there is no point in looking in his direction. This cloud storage is tightly integrated with macOS and iOS, and all data from these systems can be synchronized with it: documents, calendars, contacts and photos. iCloud works in conjunction with the native Photos app for macOS and iOS.

Windows users who have just started migrating to iPhone and Mac can download a free app that will help you upload photos and videos to your iCloud library. You can organize everything in the Photos app on iPhone, iPad, and Mac, or on the web version of iCloud.

The Photos app has great features for building a media library. It allows you to create albums, edit geotags and read metadata. A particularly cool feature of "Photos" is "smart albums", something like, in which photos are automatically placed in accordance with the conditions you specify. "Photo" is really a very convenient thing, and one can only sigh about the fact that it is not in Windows.

Price: 2 GB free, 1 TB $8.25 per month. You can learn more about tariff plans.
Applications: Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android.
Russian language support: there is.

Dropbox's main selling point is its user-friendly apps available on all desktop and mobile platforms. The disadvantage is that there is not enough space in the free version. In addition, Dropbox lacks features like search by photo content, which are characteristic of specialized Google Photos and Flickr.

All in all, if you want a service that simply uploads and stores your photos, and you can do without the gimmicks like built-in artificial intelligence and a red-eye editor, then Dropbox is your choice.

By the way, free space can be increased by sending links to friends and installing applications.

Price: 5 GB free, 1 TB for 339 rubles per month. You can learn more about tariff plans.
Applications: Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
Russian language support: there is.

Essentially, OneDrive does everything that Dropbox does, but it handles photos in an uncommonly better way. When uploading, the service automatically tags the photo: OneDrive determines the type of image (portrait, landscape, and so on) and the objects captured on it (person, animal, objects, or nature).

In addition, OneDrive recognizes geotags, so you can see where the photo was taken in the Places tab. The service also allows you to create albums, folders and tags to sort photos.

If you're a Windows 10 user, Microsoft has already installed OneDrive for you.

Connect your camera or smartphone to your computer and the app will prompt you to save your photos to your OneDrive library. This is a great service for fans of the Microsoft ecosystem, and if you subscribe to Office 365, then OneDrive is definitely your choice.

Price: 1TB and Adobe Lightroom subscription for $9.99/month. Details about tariff plans can be found.
Applications: Windows, macOS, iOS, Android.
Russian language support: there is.

But this is already a solution for either professional photographers or for avid hobbyists. it's not cheap, but with it you get Adobe Lightroom, which can do anything with pictures.

Photos in Adobe Creative Cloud are stored in a convenient and beautiful gallery, which is very easy to navigate. Supports Creative Cloud and Team Libraries so you can organize and edit your photos with friends and colleagues.

Adobe Lightroom, in conjunction with Creative Cloud, can organize photos by rating, tags, can filter out defective shots, and shows photo attributes and metadata. This tool has a lot of functions, but they are not useful to everyone.

Price: 15 GB free, 1 TB for $12.99 per month. There are tariff plans for 100 and 500 GB, 1, 2, 5 and 10 TB. Details can be found.

Applications: iOS, Android.

Russian language support: there is.

Cloud photo storage created by the giant Canon - a manufacturer of various digital equipment. Irista has a ton of features that put it on par with Google Photos and Flickr. Shared albums for sharing and sorting pictures, intelligent search through the content of images, sending photos to the cloud directly from mobile devices - it's all here.

The service’s artificial intelligence can search not only for images containing specific people, objects, and places, but also search by photographer’s style and even by camera model.

Irista supports computers and mobile devices. In addition, new Canon digital cameras are compatible with the service.

Photos in the cloud are stored in their original quality: the service does not compress them, unlike the same Google Photos. The only thing that can upset is pretty high prices but Irista is worth it. It is an excellent choice for owners of digital Canon cameras and just lovers of photography.

The best praise for a photographer is when their work is in demand. For those who are engaged in photography to order, the success criterion is real money from clients - for example, I filmed a wedding, received a fee, and that's another success. But not everyone can shoot weddings, and it’s not so easy to break into other genres of offline photography. And what about those who are just good at photographing nature, landscapes, animals? Or your friends, your children, for example? Have you ever thought about where to sell photos on the Internet? Of course it is possible. Such sites are called photobanks, or microstocks.

Photobank is an Internet agency that allows users to sell photos, videos, drawings, vector images online. A large number of images are used daily in the world, which are printed in newspapers, magazines, brochures and other promotional products, as well as on websites. It is for this reason that the demand for photography is quite large. Photobank is the main source of illustrations, because it is much cheaper than ordering work from a professional photographer.

In general, there are many photobanks, and new ones appear every year. I will mention only the most famous ones.

. This is the undisputed leader among all photo agencies and the main goal of all beginner photo stockers. Got to Shutterstock - consider your career a success. 🙂 Here, many photographers start earning almost immediately after successful registration. Every day Shutterstock sells a huge number of photos, more than anywhere else. According to statistics, most of the users who cooperate with this microstock earn from 100 to 500 dollars a month, and the income of especially successful authors reaches 10, and 15 thousand dollars, and sometimes more. However, getting here is not easy, you need to pass an exam of 10 papers, and they pass it far from the first attempt.
. It is the oldest photo bank in the industry. There was a time when getting to Aystok was very prestigious. Now it is gradually losing ground under the pressure of young and energetic photo stocks, although it still remains one of the largest. To get started, you also need to pass an exam, and it is as difficult as on Shutter. It is believed that the overall portfolio on Istock is more artistic than on Shutter.
. Also popular with photographers. The photobank is one of the largest. The catalog contains more than twenty million photos and videos. The bank offers profitable terms cooperation. And what is important for beginners, when registering, it does not require documents, and you do not need to take an exam. Register, download and earn.
. You must have often seen banners advertising this photo bank on the Internet on various sites. The agency has a large number of registered photographers from all over the world. Working with the service is very simple, the developers took care of the Russian-language interface. There is an exam at registration, but it is very simple.
. This one gives the impression of a strong middling. It does not rush forward to the level of Shutterstock, but it does not roll down either. It is very demanding on the subject and quality of images, but it does not require documents during registration, and there is no entrance exam either.
. Russian photobank, and the oldest of all. A simple interface, of course completely in Russian, a convenient search, a regularly updated collection of photos, several license options - the cost of a photo depends on its type. A special feature is the active forum of authors, where you can ask any question. The administration is constantly present on the forum, and questions are answered promptly. There is no exam, but there is a system of limits for downloading. Read more in the documentation on the site itself. I think that this stock is the most preferable for starting a stock career.
PressFoto. Another Russian photo bank, despite the Latin name. He is younger than Lori, but the image base is already larger. The interface is more like Western microstocks. Accepts vector images, photos and more. In order to successfully register, you will need three images, personal data, and the signing of an agreement. The seller receives 50% of the cost of the goods, and this noticeably distinguishes this project from other representatives on domestic market. The minimum cost of one download is 29 rubles. The price largely depends on the number of images, as well as their size.

As I said, these are only the most famous microstocks. In total, there are already more than thirty of them. And you can upload your photos to everything at once (of course, if you do not participate in certain exclusivity programs). And the total income from all stocks you can have is very impressive.

Users of one of the most popular sites for photographers, art lovers, and design ambiguously evaluate the redesign, moreover, for many, it has become an occasion to start looking for a new platform for publishing their work.

Look At Me explored alternative photo sharing platforms for personal and professional use and the communities that have developed around them.

Exposure, unlike Stampsy, was created as a platform for photographers with an emphasis on narratives, series of photographs united by one thought. In general, for photographers who want to tell stories, and not just upload photos as they come. This description includes not only sequentially arranged photographs, but also the actual description of what is happening on them. Of several such photo stories, in principle, it’s more than realistic to put together a kind of portfolio (even without buying a pro account - a free one allows you to publish three photo stories), if you don’t get around to making your own website. Although the latter, in general, in 2014 is a rather pointless undertaking.

Main plus

The ability to tell stories that are easy to read thanks to the illustrative series, and not just upload photos.

Also a kind of online photo storage, something like Tumblr, but for author's photos; the main difference from its predecessors is the ability to sell photos directly through the site. To do this, select the For Professionals option, and then set the price of the photo, etc. The service promises to take care of all legal aspects, take care of protecting your copyrights and provide round-the-clock support if, for example, selling photos is a new business for you.

Main plus

Ability to sell photos directly through the site.

A platform for creating your own portfolio website for mobile and web versions, with a separate focus on iPhone and iPad. On the basis of the Viewbook, in fact, your own site is created, within the framework of the given design variations. Viewbook has 3 types of memberships, the cheapest one starts at $4 per month.

Main plus

Create a website with your own url.

The French-based site is arguably most popular among those who fled Flickr out of dissatisfaction with being out of control. appearance your page. Ipernity, indeed, is very similar in appearance and functionality to Flickr and, most importantly for the established community, the presence of groups (where any user can add their photos) and discussions - in general, it is the exchange of experience within the forum, supported by the visual part, and Flickr was strong the most.

Main plus

A photography community where many former Flickr users migrated to.

The VSCO app is remarkable not only for its filters (and tutorials on how to use them) and the purpose of reminding you that photos can still be beautiful, even if no one needs cameras anymore, but also for its attempts (quite successful) to develop a photo community. To do this, the team maintains VSCO Journal, where it shares the best photos, selected over the last week or weekend, and also created a special social network and at the same time a photo platform - VSCO Grid, in which each user of the application can upload their photos, and the most beautiful of them can get into the "editor's choice".

Main plus

VSCO does not just provide a platform for photos, but constantly publishes tutorials and interviews with professionals, that is, it tries to give users new knowledge.

Simply put, it's Learn from photography. Website slogan: a photo a day. The photos are sorted by the date you posted them and are side by side on a calendar. That is, it’s rather not even a platform, but a photo diary, which, with its functionality, reminds you that it’s time to update a couple of photos already. Well, the feedback system works according to the same principle: subscribers write comments by analogy with the same Livejournal.

You need to be able to evaluate your own photos.

Professionals are different for professionals. In photography, there are no universal objective evaluation criteria, so it is not so much the evaluation itself that matters, but who evaluates it. The same picture is judged differently by different audiences. So, the famous picture of Andreas Gursky "Rhein II" (wikipedia.org) was most likely met with restraint on Foto.ru and not only there, which does not prevent this photo from being the most expensive in the world. I saw some famous (and certainly good) Cartier-Bresson shots being criticized on some photography forum. Should we trust such estimates?

A photograph cannot be adequately assessed without knowing why it was taken and why it was taken the way it was. There are two nuances.

The first is that photography always gravitates towards some kind of aesthetics, in each of which the image is built and perceived according to its own principles. Roughly speaking, this is the aesthetics of the Renaissance, Baroque, Impressionism and contemporary art. At the heart of the aesthetics of the Renaissance is a figurative cipher (“white rose is the emblem of sadness”), a literary component, photography in such aesthetics says something. The Baroque aesthetics is based on movement, blurring of contours, fog, perspective, dynamics - everything that we usually love in pictures. The aesthetics of impressionism is based on chromatic contrast. In the aesthetics of modern art, the basis of everything is the idea that the viewer reads himself, while the artist and the image are generally secondary.

The second nuance - if the photo is applied (wedding, advertising, reportage, etc.), then it is important how the task is solved. Aesthetics is secondary here. For example, at this link (fearlessphotographers.com), two out of three photos are rather bad, although they look cool. And this is how (jeffascough.com) looks like a cool and very professional wedding shoot. At first glance, it looks ordinary, but take a closer look: all the pictures are good and to the point, there are no technical jambs anywhere, everything is sustained in a single pictorial key, one gets a solid impression of what is happening, the photographer does not show off in anything, 127 pictures do not have time to get bored.

So how do you rate your photos? The easiest way to friend on Facebook is two dozen reputable image professionals for you personally - whether they are photographers, art historians, filmmakers, artists, etc.: if at least one likes or comments on something, then the picture should be postponed and review it after six months. The second criterion is if dozens of familiar people reacted to the picture in a few days.

The second way is to register at 500px.com. The first resource is more poppy, but if the picture got into the Editor's choice, that's good. If it just became popular there, that's not bad.

The third way is to register on 1x.com. There you can ask to criticize your work, but in return you will have to criticize the work of others. If you do this 7 hours a week, then in a year you will review several tens of thousands of pictures and learn to distinguish good from so-so.

If you shoot portraits, you should register on photovogue.it, where you can create a portfolio approved by Vogue's photo editors. They obviously have good taste, the portfolio collected there will turn out to be definitely good, but this advice is not suitable for everyone.